Ultrasonography (USG) diagnostic test compared to magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatografy (MRCP) in patients with obstructive jaundice in Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital

Authors

  • Fauziah Rahayu Rachmi Radiology Department of Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Maharina Luths Radiology Department of Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Maharina Luths Radiology Department of Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Yueniwati Yuyun Radiology Department of Dr. Saiful Anwar Public Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2020.05.2.0107

Keywords:

Obstructive Jaundice, Diagnostic, MRCP, USG, Ultrasound

Abstract

Background: Ultrasonography (USG) is still the first imaging modality for initial examination in patients with obstructive jaundice. Abdominal ultrasonography is quite good in seeing the morphology of the biliary tract, although the diagnostic etiological sensitivity of various causes of obstruction is very low. Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography (MRCP) is a new technique and can show the same picture as ERCP examination and no contrast media is needed.

Aim: Aim for this study is knowing the results of ultrasound diagnostic tests in detecting Obstruction jaundice which was confirmed by the results of MRCP examination at Dr. Moewardi public hospital.

Method: This study uses a diagnostic test that assesses sensitivity, big specifications, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of ultrasound in detecting jaundice obstruction confirmed by the results of the MRCP examination. Sampling was done by purposive sampling, on 68 research subjects.

Results: This study show the characteristics of jaundice in the form of stones with sensitivity and specificity values ​​of 84% and 83%, positive predictive value 75% and negative predictive value 90% and in biliary tract tumors 83% and 84%, positive predictive value 75% and predictive value negative 90%.

Conclusions: Ultrasound has a high sensitivity and specificity value in diagnosing obstructive jaundice in the case of biliary tract stones and biliary tract tumors.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sudoyo AW, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata M, Setiati S. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. Interna Publishing 2010; p. 634-39.

Ali M, Ahmed I, Sattar A, Akhtar MW, Hussain M, Abbas Z. Dignostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography in Evaluation of Obstructive Jaundice. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2012; 62(10):1053-6.

Alwi I, Salim S, Hidayat R, Kurniawan J, Tahapary DL. Panduan Praktik Klinis. p. 251-55

Farrukh SZ, Siddiqui AR, Haqqi SA, Muhammad AJ, et al. Comparison of Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients of Obstructive Jaundice with Edoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography Findings. Journal Ayub Med Collection Abbottabad. 2016; 28(4)

Karki S, Joshi KS, Regmi S, et al. Role of Ultrasound as Compared with ERCP in patient with Obstructive Jaundice. Kathmandu Univ Med Journal. 2013; 11(43):237-40.

Amandeep Singh,et.al. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice. 2014.10.7860/JCDR/2014/8149.4120

Taufiqurrahman, M 2008. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian untuk Ilmu Kesehatan. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Latan, H 2014. Aplikasi Analisis Data Statistik untuk Ilmu Sosial Sains dengan IBM SPSS. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Fekej,et.al. Obstructive Jaundice. 2017. Austin Publishing Group.

Krige,et.al. Modern Imaging in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice. 2007; Vol.25 No.7.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

Rachmi, F. R., Luths, M., Luths, M., & Yuyun, Y. (2020). Ultrasonography (USG) diagnostic test compared to magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatografy (MRCP) in patients with obstructive jaundice in Dr. Moewardi Public Hospital. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 5(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2020.05.2.0107

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)