Determination of the chemical compounds and mineral contents in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown under deficit irrigation conditions

Authors

  • Şengül Memnune Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
  • Kuşlu Yasemin Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University 25240 Erzurum-Turkey.
  • Zor Melek Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, School of Tourism and Hotel Management, İbrahim Çeçen University, 04100 Ağrı, Turkey
  • Yılmaz Bilal Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2021.6.1.0049

Keywords:

Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum, Deficit irrigation, Chemical compound profile, Mineral content, GC-MS

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of deficit irrigation applications on the chemical compounds and mineral contents of tomatoes. In the study, a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) hybrid "Nehir F1" was grown in a greenhouse that had a natural light, heating and ventilation system and was covered with polycarbonate material. The tomatoes were irrigated every three days by applying 60% (T1), 80% (T2), 100% (T3) and 120% (T4) of the evaporation value after reading and determining it from the reduced evaporation pan. The tomatoes were harvested at the red-ripe maturity stage and analyses were performed. As a result of the study a total of 60 compounds were determined in the tomato samples by using Gas chromatography/Mass Spectrometer system. The most abundant compounds in terms of both amount and variety in the tomatoes were identified as ketones, sugars and fatty acid esters. Furthermore, the mineral content of the tomatoes changed according to the irrigation application. K, Mg, P, Ca and Fe were accumulated in the all tomatoes samples.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Garbowicz K, Liu Z, Alseekh S, Tieman D, Taylor M, Kuhalskaya A, Ofner I, Zamir D, Klee HJ, Fernie AR and Brotman Y. (2018). Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis Identifies a Prominent Gene Involved in the Production of Fatty Acid-Derived Flavor Volatiles in Tomato. Molecular Plant, 11, 1147-1165.

Wu Q, Tao X, Ai X, Luo Z, Mao, L,Ying T and Li L. (2018). Contribution of abscisic acid to aromatic volatiles in cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit during postharvest ripening. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 130, 205-214.

Niu Y, Li N, Xia Q, Hou Y and Xu G. (2018). Comparisons of three modifications on structural, rheological and functional properties of soluble dietary fibers from tomato peels. LWT, 88, 56-63.

Capanoglu E, Beekwilder J, Boyacıoglu D, De Vos RCH and Hall RD. (2010). The Effect of Industrial Food Processing on Potentially Health-Beneficial Tomato Antioxidants. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 50, 919-930.

Katırcı N, Çağlar NI, Güpür Ç, Guler HO, Gursoy O and Yilmaz Y. (2020). Differences in antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of commercial and homemade tomato pastes. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 19(4), 249-254.

Salehi B, Sharifi-Rad R, Sharopov F, Namiesnik J, Kamle M, Kumar P, Martins N and Sharifi-Rad J. (2019). Beneficial effects and potential risks of tomato consumption for human health: An overview. Nutrition, 62, 201-208.

Opatic AM, Necemer M, Lojen S, Masten J, Zlatic E, Sircelj H, Stopar D and Vidrih R. (2018). Determination of geographical origin of commercial tomato through analysis of stable isotopes, elemental composition and chemical markers. Food Control, 89, 133-141.

Navarro-González I, García-Valverde V, García-Alonso J and Periago MJ. (2011). Chemical profile, functional and antioxidant properties of tomato peel fiber. Food Research International, 44, 1528-1535.

Wang D and Seymour GB. (2017). Tomato flavor: Lost and found? Molecular Plant, 10, 782-784.

Lee JHJ, Jayaprakasha GK, Avila CA, Crosby KM and Patil BS. (2019). Metabolomic studies of volatiles from tomatoes grown in net-house and open-field conditions. Food Chemistry, 275, 282-291.

Coyago-Cruza E, Meléndez-Martínez A J, Moriana A, Girónd I F, Martín-Palomoa MJ, Galindof A, Pérez-Lópezg D, Torrecillash A, Beltrán-Sinchiguanoi E and Corella M. (2019). Yield response to regulated deficit irrigation of greenhouse cherry tomatoes. Agricultural Water Management, 213, 212-221.

Vaccari FP, Maienza A, Miglietta F, Baronti S, Di Lonardo S, Giagnoni L, Lagomarsino A, Pozzi A, Pusceddu E, Ranieri R, Valboa G and Genesio L. (2015). Biochar stimulates plant growth but not fruit yield of processing tomato in a fertile soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 207, 163-170.

Tinyane PP, Sivakumar D and Soundy P. (2013). Influence of photo-selective netting on fruit quality parameters and bioactive compounds in selected tomato cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 161, 340-349.

Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G and Grolier P. (2003). Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes (Review). J. Sci. Food Agric., 83, 369-382.

Ehret DL, Usher K, Helmer T, Block G, Steinke D, Frey B, Kuang T and Diarra M. (2013). Tomato fruit antioxidants in relation to salinity and greenhouse climate. J. Agric. Food Chem., 1, 1138-1145.

Rani V and Khetarpaul N. (2009). Nutrient composition of tomato products prepared using tomato grown under sodic condition with gypsum and farmyard manure treatment. J Sci. Food Agric., 89, 2601-2607.

Dorais M, Ehret DL and Papadopoulos AP. (2008). Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem. Rev.,7, 231-250.

Schmautz Z, Loeu F, Liebisch F, Graber A, Mathis A, Bulc TG and Junge R. (2016). Tomato productivity and quality in aquaponics: comparison of three hydroponic methods. Water, 8, 533.

Wang C, Wu S, Tankari M, Zhang X, Li L, Gong D, Hao W, Zhang Y, Mei X, WangY, Liu F and Wang Y. (2018). Stomatal aperture rather than nitrogen nutrition determined water use efficiency of tomato plants under nitrogen fertigation. Agricultural Water Management, 209, 94-101.

Licata M, La Bella S, Virga G, Leto C and Tuttolomondo T. (2017). Management of irrigation water and nutrient demands of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) using urban treated wastewater from a pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow system constructed wetland in Sicily (Italy). Desalination and Water Treatment, 73, 422-439.

Yurtseven E, Kesmez GD and Ünlükara A. (2005). The effects of water salinity and potassium levels on yield, fruit quality and water consumption of a native central Anatolian tomato species (Lycopersicon esculantum). Agricultural Water Management, 78, 128-135.

Di Cesare LF, Migliori C, Ferrari V, Parisi M, Campanelli G, Candido V and Perrone D. (2012). Effects of Irrigation-Fertilization and Irrigation-Mycorrhization on the Alimentary and Nutraceutical Properties of Tomatoes. Chapter in: Irrigation Systems and Practices in Challenging Environments.

Helyes L, Lugasi A and Pek Z. (2012). Effect of irrigation on processing tomato yield and antioxidant components. Turk J. Agric. For., 36, 702-709.

Bakr J, Daood HG, Pek Z, Helyes L and Posta K. (2017). Yield and quality of mycorrhized processing tomato under water scarcity. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15, 401-413.

Anonymous. (2007). Trace elements As, Cd, Hg, Pb and other elements. Determination by ICP-MS after pressure digestion. Nordic Committee on Food Analysis No: 186, 14.

Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Einstein MA, Malundo TMM, Shewfelt RL and Tandon KS. (1998). Relationship between sensory and instrumental analysis for tomato flavor. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 123, 906-915.

Agius C, Von Tucher S, Poppenberger B and Rozhon W. (2018). Quantification of sugars and organic acids in tomato fruits. MethodsX, 5, 537-550.

Bayrak A. (2006). Food Aromas. Food Thechnology Association. Publication id: 32, Ankara, Turkey.

Buttery RG, Stern DJ and Ling LC. (1994). Studies on flavor volatiles of some sweet corn products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 42, 791-795.

Steinhaus P and Schieberle P. (2007). Characterization of the key aroma compounds in soy sauce using approaches of molecular sensory science. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 55, 6262-6269.

Wang Y, Juliani HR, Simon JE and Ho C-T. (2009). Amino acid-dependent formation pathways of 2-acetylfuran and 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3[2H]-furanone in the Maillard reaction. Food Chemistry, 115, 233-237.

Nashalian O, Wang X and Yaylayan VA. (2016). Formation of the reduced form of furaneol® (2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-tetrahydrofuran-3-one) during the Maillard reaction through catalysis of amino acid metal salts. Food Chemistry, 210, 43-48.

Sapiejka E, Krzyżanowska-Jankowska P, Wenska-Chyży E, Szczepanik M, Walkowiak D, Cofta S, Pogorzelski A, Skorupa W and Walkowiak J. (2018). Vitamin E status and its determinants in patients with cystic fibrosis. Advances in Medical Sciences, 63, 341-346.

Thybo AK, Edelenbos M, Christensen LP, Sørensen JN and Thorup-Kristensen K. (2006). Effect of organic growing systems on sensory quality and chemical composition of tomatoes. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 39: 835-843.

Wang L-B, Bai J and Yu Z-F. (2016). Difference in volatile profile between pericarp tissue and locular gel in tomato fruit. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12, 2911-2920.

Selli S, Kelebek H, Ayseli MT and Tokbas H. (2014). Characterization of the most aroma-active compounds in cherry tomato by application of the aroma extract dilution analysis. Food Chemistry, 165, 540-546.

Sarpras M, Ahmad I and Ramchiary N. (2019). Comparative analysis of developmental changes of fruit metabolites, antioxidant activities and mineral elements content in Bhut jolokia and other Capsicum species. LWT, 105, 363-370.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-30

How to Cite

Memnune, Şengül, Yasemin, K., Melek, Z., & Bilal, Y. (2021). Determination of the chemical compounds and mineral contents in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown under deficit irrigation conditions. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 6(1), 001–008. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2021.6.1.0049

Issue

Section

Original Article