The game theory applied to the Covid-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2021.9.2.0260Keywords:
COVID-19, WHO, Coase Theorem, Pareto BalanceAbstract
The classification of COVID-19 as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), substantiated a global crisis in public and economic health, exposing failures of governments and markets in terms of the ability to act in a corrective, preventive and, above all, predictive manner, given the appearance of exogenous factors. One of the visible consequences of the pandemic is the polarization between Economy and Health in the countries, creating a competitive environment that resembles a duopoly where each player ends up acting and making their decisions according to what the other does. This article considers this scenario by quantitatively evaluating economic results that are possible to be achieved when in a negotiation essay between ‘Economics’ and ‘Health’, using the economic theory of games. The discussion developed points out to the existence of an “optimal strategy” for both the ‘Economy’ and ‘Health’ player, capable of maximizing the expected payoff for the population. From the application of the Pareto Equilibrium combined with the Coase Theorem, there is an opportunity to eliminate market and government failures with the achievement of a ‘Social Optimum’ throughout this and eventual future pandemics.
Metrics
References
BAUMOL, William J, LITAN, Robert E, SCHRAMM, Carl J. Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity. Yale University Press. 2007.
VETTER, Andrea. The matrix of convivial technology–assessing technologies for the growth. Journal of cleaner production. 2018; 197: 1778-1786.
VARELA, Francisco J.; DUPUY, Jean-Pierre (Ed.). Understanding Origins: Contemporary Views on the Origins of Life, Mind and Society. Springer Science & Business Media. 2013.
BOSSELMANN, Klaus. The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance. Taylor & Francis. 2016.
MANES, Paola. Assessing Conduct Risk: A New Challenge for Sustainable Corporate Governance. European Business Law Review. 2019; 30(6): 985-1014.
ODELL, John S. negotiating the world economy. Cornell University Press. 2018.
MAWSON, Anthony R. Mass panic and social attachment: The dynamics of human behavior. Routledge. 2017.
PATEL, Ebrahim. Should we panic over prescribed assets? MoneyMarketing. Jul 2019; 1-3.
ZHANG, Wei-Bin. Cournot-Nash Family Decision and Economic Growth in an Extended Solowian Model, Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania. January 2020; 21: 101-114.
CARLSSON-SZLEZAK, Philipp; REEVES, Martin; SWARTZ, Paul. What coronavirus could mean for the global economy. Harvard Business Review. 2020; 1-101960
FETZER, Thiemo et al. Coronavirus perceptions and economic anxiety. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.03848. 2020.
CIRILLO, Renato. The Economics of Vilfredo Pareto. Routledge. 2012.
DERYUGINA, Tatyana; MOORE, Frances TOL, Richard SJ. Applications of the Coase Theorem. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2004.04247
ABDEL-BASSET, Mohamed et al. A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019; 90: 489-502.
CHAPPELOW, Jim. Corporate Finance & Accounting Web portal, 2019.
COASE, Ronald H. The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics. 1960; 3(1): 1–44.
CARFÌ D, SCHILIRO D. Crisis in the Euro Area. Coopetitive Game Solutions as New Policy Tools. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields (TPREF). 2011; 1(3): 23-36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.