Life cycle assessment and circular economy in conjunction with treatment methodologies: Presentation and critical comparison between different food industry waste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2020.3.3.0048Keywords:
LCA, Circular Economy, Food waste, Anaerobic digestion, landfilling, IncinerationAbstract
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) principles coupled with Circular Economy are well described in this review addressing LCA examples worldwide. Applications of LCA in the food industry are well outlined with examples from the dairy sector and dairy effluents, meat sector (pork), poultry and eggs, coffee, fish canning, animal feed and used cooking oil. LCA is then explained as a management strategy in the food packaging sector. One of the best methodologies for food waste or bio-waste is anaerobic digestion with production of biogas. This review shows the effect of food, energy, water on human life. Hence, we all should be aware that our interventions might affect all these food sectors positively or negatively as well as our lives in general.
Metrics
References
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (2014). Food wastage footprint - full-cost accounting - final report.
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations – FAO. (2015). Food wastage footprint & climate change.
The World Bank. (2016). Total greenhouse gas emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent).
EC. (2015). Closing the Loop-An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2015), 614 (2). European Commission (EC), Brussels.
EMF. (2015). Delivering the Circular Economy - A Toolkit for Policy Makers. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF), Isle of Wight.
DEFRA. (2018). Food and drink waste hierarchy: deal with surplus and waste.
Oldfield TL, White E and Holden NM. (2016). An environmental analysis of options for utilising wasted food and food residue. Journal of Environmental Management, 183 (3), 826–835.
Bernstad A and la Cour Jansen J. (2011). A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste – a Swedish full-scale case study. Waste Management, 31(8), 1879–1896.
Bernstad A and la Cour Jansen J. (2012). Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – current status and potential improvements. Waste Management, 32 (12), 2439–2455.
Slorach PC, Jeswani HK, Cuéllar-Franca R and Azapagic. (2019). A. Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy. Science Total Environment, 693, 133516.
Yeo J, Chopra SS, Zhang L and An AK. (2019). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of food waste treatment in Hong Kong: On-site fermentation methodology. Journal of Environmental Management, 240, 343–351.
Oh J and Lee H. (2015). Experimental evaluation and resident's assessment of zero food waste system in multi-family housing estates. Journal of Korean Society Environmental Engineering, 37, 674–681.
Battini F, Agostini A, Boulamanti AK, Giuntoli J and Amaducci S. (2014). Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. Science Total Environment, 481, 196-208.
Hospido A, Moreira MT and Feijoo G. (2003). Simplified life cycle assessment of Galician milk production. International Dairy Journal, 13, 783-796.
Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N and Shiina T. (2009). A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering, 90, 1-10.
Kimming M, Sundberg C, Nordberg Å, Baky A, Bernesson S and Hansson PA. (2015). Replacing fossil energy for organic milk production e potential biomass sources and greenhouse gas emission reductions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 400-407.
Murgia L, Todde G, Caria M and Pazzona A. (2013). A partial life cycle assessment approach to evaluate the energy intensity and related greenhouse gas emission in dairy farms. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 44.
Dolman MA, Sonneveld MPW, Mollenhorst H and De Boer IJM. (2014). Benchmarking the economic, environmental and societal performance of Dutch dairy farms aiming at internal recycling of nutrients. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 245-252.
Rosa F. (2018). Waste Generated by Food Industry and Reuse in A Circular Economy Approach: the Whey Processing. Concepts of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences.
Gottschall N, Boutin C, Crolla A, Kinsley C and Champagne P. (2007). The role of plants in the removal of nutrients at a constructed wetland treating agricultural (dairy) wastewater, Ontario, Canada. Ecological Engineering, 29, 154-163.
Kılkıs S and Kılkıs B. (2017). Integrated circular economy and education model to address aspects of an energy-water-food nexus in a dairy facility and local contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1084-1098.
Stanchev P, Vasilaki V, Egas D, Colon J, Ponsa S and Katsou E. (2020). Multilevel environmental assessment of the anaerobic treatment of dairy processing effluents in the context of circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121139.
De Olde EM, van der Linden A, olde Bolhaar LD and de Boer IJM. (2020). Sustainability challenges and innovations in the Dutch egg sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120974.
Soisontes S. (2017). Concerns about sustainability in the poultry industry: a comparative Delphi study in Germany and Thailand. World Poultry Science Journal, 73 (4), 886-903.
Bos JM, van den, Belt H and Feindt PH. (2018). Animal welfare, consumer welfare, and competition law: the Dutch debate on the Chicken of Tomorrow. Animal Frontiers, 8(1), 20-26.
Busch G, Gauly M and Spiller A. (2018). Opinion paper: what needs to be changed for successful future livestock farming in Europe? Animal, 12(10), 1999-2001.
Janssen M, Rodiger M and Hamm U. (2016). Labels for animal husbandry systems meet consumer preferences: results from a meta-analysis of consumer studies. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics, 29(6), 1071-1100.
Van Loo EJ, Caputo V, Nayga RM and Verbeke W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137-150.
Zakowska-Biemans S and Tekien A. (2017). Free range, organic? Polish consumers preferences regarding information on farming system and nutritional enhancement of eggs: a discrete choice-based experiment. Sustainability, 9(11).
Cameron A and O'Malley S. (2016). Coffee Ground Recovery Program Summary Report. Planet Ark.
Karmee SK. (2017).A spent coffee grounds based biorefinery for the production of biofuels, biopolymers, antioxidants and biocomposites. Waste Management (Oxford), 72, 240–254.
Kookos IK. (2018). Techno-economic and environmental assessment of a process for biodiesel production from spent coffee grounds (SCGs). Resources Conservation Recycling, 134, 156–164.
Tuntiwiwattanapun N, Monono E, Wiesenborn D and Tongcumpou C. (2017). In-situ transesterification process for biodiesel production using spent coffee grounds from the instant coffee industry. Industrial Crops Production, 102, 23–31.
Lange L, Bech L, Busk PK, Grell MN, Huang Y, Lange M, Linde T, Pilgaard B, Roth D and Tong X. (2012).The importance of fungi and of mycology for a global development of the bioeconomy. IMA Fungus Global Mycology Journal, 3, 87–92.
EC. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, 3.
DEFRA. (2011). Guidance on Applying the Waste Hierarchy. Royal Academy of Engineering.
EC. (2017a).The role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy. COM (2017) 34 final.
EC. (2012). Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
Schmidt Rivera XC, Gallego-Schmid A, Najdanovic-Visak V and Azapagic A. (2020). Life cycle environmental sustainability of valorisation routes for spent coffee grounds. From waste to resources Resources Conservation and Recycling, 157, 104751.
Lorenzo-Toja Y, Vázquez-Rowe I, Amores MJ, Termes-Rifé M, Marín-Navarro D, Moreira MT and Feijoo G. (2016). Benchmarking wastewater treatment plants under an eco-efficiency perspective. Science Total Environment, 566–567, 468–479.
Laso J, Margallo M, Celaya J, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien A and Aldaco R. (2016a). Waste management under a life cycle approach as a tool for a circular economy in the canned anchovy industry. Waste Management Research, 34(8), 724–733.
Laso J, Margallo M, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien A and Aldaco R. (2016b). Introducing life cycle thinking to define best available techniques for products: application to the anchovy canning industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(1), 139–150.
Laso J, Margallo M, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien A and Aldaco R. (2017). When product diversification influences life cycle impact assessment: a case study of canned anchovy. Science Total Environment, 581–582, 629–639.
Laso J, Vázquez-Rowe I, Margallo M, Crujeiras RM, Irabien A and Aldaco R. (2018a). Life cycle assessment of European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) landed by purse seine vessels in northern Spain. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 1107–1125.
ISO 14045. (2012). Environmental Management – Eco-efficiency Assessment of Product Systems-Principles, Requirements and Guidelines.
Yang D, Fan L, Shi F, Liu Q and Wang Y. (2017). Comparative study of cement manufacturing with different strength grades using the coupled LCA and partial LCC methods-A case study in China. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 119, 60–68.
Di Maio F, Rem PC, Baldé K and Polder M. (2017). Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: a market value approach. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 122, 163–171.
Laso J, García-Herrero I, Margallo M, Vázquez-Rowe I, Fullana P, Bala A, Gazulla C, Irabien Á and Aldaco R. (2018b). Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. Resources Conservation Recycling, 133, 428–437.
Dolman MA, Vrolijk HCJ and de Boer IJM. (2012). Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms. Livestock Science, 149 (1–2), 143–154.
Dourmad JY, Ryschawy J, Trousson T, Bonneau M, González J, Houwers HWJ, Hviid M, Zimmer C, Nguyen TLT and Morgensen L. (2014). Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with the life cycle assessment. Animal, 8, 2027–2037.
Halberg N, Hermansen JE, Kristensen IS, Eriksen J, Tvedegaard N and Petersen BM. (2010). Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution. Agronomic Sustainability Deviation, 30(4), 721–731.
Pelletier N, Lammers P, Stender D and Pirog R. (2010). Life cycle assessment of high- and low-profitability commodity and deep-bedded niche swine production systems in the upper Midwestern United States Agricultural Systems, 103(9), 599–608.
Devers L, Kleynhans TE and Mathijs E. (2012). Comparative life cycle assessment of Flemish andWestern Cape pork production. Agrekon, 51, 105–128.
Jacobsen R, Vandermeulen V, Van Huylenbroeck G and Gellynck X. (2013). Carbon footprint of pigmeat in Flanders. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 12, 54–70.
Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE and Mogensen L. (2011). Environmental Assessment of Danish Pork. Internal Report. Faculty of Agricultural Science, Aarhus University.
Reckmann K, Traulsen I and Krieter J. (2013). Life cycle assessment of pork production: a data inventory for the case of Germany. Livestock Science, 157, 586–596.
Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Grist S and Grant T. (2010). Environmental Assessment of Two Pork Supply Chains Using Life Cycle Assessment. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Australian Government, Australia.
FAO. World Livestock. (2011). Livestock in Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011, Rome.
FAO. FAO's Animal Production and Health Division: Meat & Meat Products (online). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (2014).
FAOSTAT. (2013). FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Observatori del Porcí. (2013). Informe anual de l'observatori del porcí. Department d'Agricultura, Ramadería, Pesta, Alimentació i Medi Natural (DAAM). Generalitat de Catalunya ISBN: 978-84-697-1467-6.
PRTR. (2014). Registro Estatal de Emisiones y Fuentes Contaminantes. Ministerios de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Spain.
Notarnicola B, Hyashi K, Curran MA and Huisingh D. (2012). Progress in working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 1–8.
Noya I, Aldea X, González-García S, Gasol CM, Moreira MT, Amores MJ, Marín D and Boschmonart-Rives J. (2017). Environmental assessment of the entire pork value chain in Catalonia – A strategy to work towards Circular Economy. Science of the Total Environment, 589, 122–129.
EPFRA. (2016). Rendering in numbers.
Lasekan A, Abu Bakar F and Hashim D. (2013). Potential of chicken by-products as sources of useful biological resources. Waste Management, 33(3), 552-565.
Watanabe T. (1989). Nutritive value of animal and plant lipid sources for fish. In: Shiau SY. Marine (Ed.), Progress in Fish Nutrition. Proc. Fish Nutrition Symp, 9, 151-166.
European Commission. (2013). Commission Regulation (EU) No 56/2013 of 16 January 2013 amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Off. J.Eur. Union 30, 33-43.
NRC. (2011). Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp. The National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.
Silva CB, Valente LM, Matos E, Brandao M and Neto B. (2018). Life cycle assessment of aquafeed ingredients. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(5), 995-1017.
Pelletier N and Tyedmers P. (2007). Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture, 272(1-4), 399-416.
Campos IL, Pinheiro Valente M, Matos E, Marques P and Freire F. (2020). Life-cycle assessment of animal feed ingredients: Poultry fat, poultry by-product meal and hydrolyzed feather meal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119845.
Guinee J, Gorree M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes H, Bruijn H, van Duin R and Huijbregts M. (2002). Handbook on LCA, Operational Guide to the ISO Standards.
Phillips D. (2019). In: Tomkinson J. (Ed.), Implications of Imported Used Cooking Oil (UCO) as a Biodiesel Feedstock, NNFCC Ltd, York, UK, 24.
European Commission. (2013). In: L. Programme (Ed.), BIOFUELS-2G Demonstration of a Sustainable & Effective 2nd Generation Biofuels Application in an Urban Environment, 64.
Cordero-Ravelo V and Schallenberg-Rodriguez J. (2018). Biodiesel production as a solution to waste cooking oil (WCO) disposal. Will any type of WCO do for a transesterification process? A quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 228, 117-129.
Loizides MI, Loizidou XI, Orthodoxou DL and Petsa D. (2019). Circular bioeconomy in action: collection and recycling of domestic used cooking oil through a social, reverse logistics system. Recycling, 4(2), 16.
Foteinis S, Chatzisymeon E, Litinas A and Tsoutsos T.(2020). Used-cooking-oil biodiesel: Life cycle assessment and comparison with first- and third-generation biofuel. Renewable Energy, 153, 588-600.
Albuquerque LMT, Mattos CA, Scur G and Kissimoto K. (2019). Life cycle costing and externalities to analyze circular economy strategy: Comparison between aluminum packaging and tinplate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 477-486.
Poças F and Hogg TA. (2007). Exposure assessment of chemicals from packaging materials in foods: a review. Trends Food Science and Technology, 18, 219–230.
Muncke J. (2011). Endocrine disrupting chemicals and other substances of concern in food contact materials: an updated review of exposure, effect and risk assessment. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry Molecular Biology, 127 (1-2), 118–127.
FDA. (2015a). CEDI Database.
Karmaus AL, Filer DL, Martin MT and Houck KA. (2016). Evaluation of food-relevant chemicals in the ToxCast high-throughput screening program. Food Chemical Toxicology, 92, 188–196.
Biedermann M and Grob K. (2013). Assurance of safety of recycled paperboard for food packaging through comprehensive analysis of potential migrants is unrealistic. Journal of Chromatography A, 1293, 107–119.
Maffini MV, Alger HM, Olson ED and Neltner TG. (2013). Looking back to look forward: a review of FDA’s food additives safety assessment and recommendations for modernizing its program. Comprehensive Reviews Food Science and Food Safety, 12, 439–453.
Neltner TG, Alger HM, Leonard JE and Maffini MV. (2013). Data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in food in the United States. Reproductive Toxicology, 42, 85–94.
Kortenkamp A. (2014). Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters and their implications for regulatory thresholds in chemical risk assessment. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 19, 105–111.
EFSA. (2017). Non-plastic food contact materials European Food Safety Authority.
Oldring PKT, O’Mahony C, Dixon J, Vints M, Mehegan J, Dequatre C and Castle L. (2014). Development of a new modelling tool (FACET) to assess exposure to chemical migrants from food packaging. Food Additives Contaminants Part Chemical Analytical Control Expo Risk Assessment, 31, 444–465.
Biryol D, Phillips K, Nicolas C, et al (2015). High-throughput dietary exposure predictions for chemical migrants from food packaging materials. ISES Annual Meeting, Henderson, NV, Henderson, NV, October, 18 – 23.
Ernstoff A, Niero M, Muncke J, Trier X, Rosenbaum RK, Hauschild M and Fantke P. (2019). Challenges of including human exposure to chemicals in food packaging as a new exposure pathway in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 543–552.
Alexy P, Anklam E, Emans T, Furfari A, Galgani F, Hanke G, Koelmans A, Pant R, Saveyn H and Sokull Kluettgen B. (2020). Managing the analytical challenges related to micro- and nanoplastics in the environment and food: filling the knowledge gaps. Food Additives and Contaminants Part A, 37(1), 1–10.
European Commission. (2018b). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment, COM (2018) 340 final.
Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C and Galloway TS. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 2588–2597.
Boucher J and Friot D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the oceans: a global evaluation of sources. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN, 43.
[GESAMP] Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection. (2019). Joint group of experts on the scientific aspects of marine environmental protection: sources, fates and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global assessment (Kershaw PJ, Rochman CM, Eds.), GESAMP reports and studies number, 93, 220.
Law KL and Johnson RC. (2014). Microplastics in the seas. Science, 80, 144–145.
Verschoor AJ. (2015). Towards a definition of microplastics –considerations for the specification of physico-chemical properties, RIVM Letter Report, 0116.
[SAPEA] Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. (2019). A scientific perspective on microplastics in nature and society, SAPEA Report.
Hartmann NB, Hueffer T, Thompson RC, Hasselloev M, Verschoor A, Daugaard AE, Rist AS, Karlsson T, Brennholt N, Cole M, et al. (2019). Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environmental Science and Technology, 53, 1039–1047.
Wikström F, Williams H and Venkatesh G. (2016). The influence of packaging attributes on recycling and food waste behaviour—An environmental comparison of two packaging alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 895–902.
Belley, C. (2011). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Report of Food Packaging Products.
Ingrao C, Lo Giudice A, Bacenetti J, Mousavi Khaneghah A, Sant’Ana AS, Rana R and Siracusa V. (2015). Foamy polystyrene trays for fresh-meat packaging: Life-Cycle inventory data collection and environmental impact assessment. Food Research International, 76, 418–426.
Ingrao C, Gigli M and Siracusa V. (2017). An attributional Life Cycle Assessment application experience to highlight environmental hotspots in the production of foamy polylactic acid trays for fresh-food packaging usage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 93–103.
Suwanmanee U, Varabuntoonvit V, Chaiwutthinan P, Tajan M, Mungcharoen T and Leejarkpai T. (2013). Life cycle assessment of single use thermoform boxes made from polystyrene (PS), polylactic acid, (PLA), and PLA/starch: Cradle to consumer gate. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 401–417.
Gallego-Schmid A, Mendoza JMF and Azapagic A. (2019). Environmental impacts of takeaway food containers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 417–427.
Gallego-Schmid A, Mendoza JMF and Azapagic A. (2018). Improving the environmental sustainability of reusable food containers in Europe. Science Total Environment, 628–629, 979–989.
Maga D, Hiebel M and Aryan VA. (2019). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays. Made of Various Packaging Materials. Sustainability, 11, 5324.
Langendorff J. (2018). More and better recycling for a circular economy – the EU in action. European Recycling Conference, Berlin.
CEA. (2019). Plastic waste disposal fee (private communication).
WRAP. (2019). Market Snapshot.
Mastellone ML. (2020). Technical description and performance evaluation of different packaging plastic waste management's systems in a circular economy perspective. Science Total Environment, 718, 137233.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 M Antoniadou, P Tsarouhas, T arzakas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.