Randomized allocation of oocytes to IVF or ICSI for IVF-naïve cases with unexplained infertility in an IVF-ICSI Split protocol favors ICSI to optimize live birth outcomes
1 PIVET Medical Centre Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6007.
2 Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6845.
Research Article
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2021, 17(03), 010–037.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscbps.2021.17.3.0346
Publication history:
Received on 29 October 2021; revised on 01 December 2021; accepted on 03 December 2021
Abstract:
In assisted reproduction treatments (ART), applying the ICSI method for fertilization of oocytes rather than traditional IVF method, is regarded as controversial for two reasons, namely utility and safety. Our study examines an IVF-ICSI Split model for couples with unexplained infertility, where male factor is meticulously excluded and ART is conducted by a strict algorithm, a commitment to blastocyst culture, along with single embryo transfers and a high commitment to cryopreservation. From 242 treatment cycles, 3346 oocytes recovered (13.8 per OPU) were randomly allocated to IVF or ICSI and the fertilization rates standardized to the number of 2PNS arising from each group applying the metaphase II oocyte number identified for the ICSI group, as the denominator for both groups. The fertilization rates were significantly higher overall for ICSI (83.2% vs 65.4%; p<0.0001), being most pronounced for women under 40 years. The resultant embryos had equivalent implantation rates in both fresh ET and frozen (FET) cycles with no significant differences in pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates or live birth outcomes indicating equivalent embryo quality. However, there were significantly higher numbers of ICSI-generated embryos cryopreserved and subsequent FET procedures showed higher live birth rates (21 births vs 6 births; p<0.005) and potential livebirths (214 births vs 104 births; p<0.0001). No congenital fetal abnormalities were detected in any of the 199 babies delivered during the study period to December 2020, neither IVF-generated nor ICSI-generated. Whilst the data strongly favors ICSI, there were 2 women (from 26 with fertilization in one arm only) who demonstrated fertilization only in the IVF arm of the study. We conclude that the IVF-ICSI Split model should be undertaken on all IVF-naïve women with unexplained infertility to determine the appropriate fertilization mode, albeit ICSI will be safely preferred for >90% of cases.
Keywords:
Assisted reproduction treatments (ART); In vitro fertilization [IVF]; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]; Single embryo transfer (SET); Frozen embryo transfer (FET); Live birth productivity rate (LBPR)
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0
