Risk score for assessment of adults with acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage: A prospective study
1 Emergency department, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq.
2 Clinical Pharmacy department, Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq.
Research Article
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 13(02), 225-231.
Article DOI: 10.30574/gscbps.2020.13.2.0376
Publication history:
Received on 15 November 2020; revised on 23 November 2020; accepted on 25 November 2020
Abstract:
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding has created an increasing demand for medical and surgical care; in addition, It is potentially serious and considered life-threatening in all age groups. This prospective study aims to find out the most common causes of GI bleedings, the incidence, the mode of treatment, and to investigate whether a simplified clinical score was able to predict the level of severity in the emergency department. About 170 patients aged (19 – 73) years who had been admitted to the emergency department in Baghdad teaching hospital were prospectively evaluated according to the causes of GI bleeding they presented with, the mode of treatment, and the degree of severity. Out of 170 patients included in this study, 95 patients (55.88%) were males, and 75 patients (44.12%) were females, with an average age of 41.11 years. The causes of GI bleeding were peptic ulcer (29.41%), gastritis (18.82%), diverticulitis (8.82%), hemorrhoids (8.23%), colonic cancer (7.64%), inflammatory bowel diseases (7.64%), anal fissure (7.05%), mesenteric ischemia (7.05%) and oesophagal varices (5.29%). Most of the cases of a peptic ulcer due to duodenal ulcer. Diagnostic endoscopy and conservative management were the main modes of treatment in these patients. Peptic ulcer and gastritis appear to be the main causes of GI bleeding, especially upper GI bleeding, while diverticulitis seems to be the main cause of lower GI bleeding and can be managed conservatively. Haemorrhoids and anal fissures will be managed surgically, either elective or emergency surgery. Also, our simplified clinical score appeared to be associated with the detection of the level of severity, which may deserve urgent interventions.
Keywords:
Gastrointestinal bleeding; Risk score; Hemorrhage; Mode of treatment
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0
