Responses of ornamental Mussaenda species stem cuttings to varying concentrations of naphthalene acetic acid phytohormone application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2017.1.1.0009Keywords:
Domestication, Gardening, Mussaenda species, Ornamentals, Phytohormones, PropagationAbstract
This study evaluated the rooting and sprouting responses of four ornamental Mussaendas species (Flag bush) stem cuttings to treatment with varying concentrations of 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). Species evaluated include Mussaenda afzelii (wild), M. erythrophylla, M. philippica and Pseudomussaenda flava. Different concentrations of NAA phytohormone were applied to the cuttings grown in mixed river sand and saw dust (1:1; v/v); and laid out in a 4 x 4 factorial experiment in completely randomized design (CRD; r=4). Results showed that increasing concentrations of NAA application slowed down emerging shoot bud in M. afzelii, P. flava, M. erythrophylla and M. philippica. While other species responded positively at some point to increased concentrations of the NAA applications, the P. flava showed retarding effect of phytohormone treatment on its number of leaves. However, M. afzelii, M. erythrophylla and M. philippica, showed marked boost in their number of roots (NR) with the NAA increased application. The 0.2% NAA treated cuttings gave highest mean NR (4.6 roots) per stem cutting followed by the cuttings that received 0.4% NAA treatment which gave 4.3 mean NR, all of which were significantly different (p≤0.05). In terms of species response to the phytohormone positive effect, M. philippica gave highest mean NR (6.1 roots), followed by M. afzelii and M. erythrophylla which had 3.8 and 3.4 roots per cutting respectively. Evidently, the study has contributed to the conservation and propagation of ornamental Mussaenda collections in addition to providing vital information towards domestication of the wild indigenous species Mussaenda afzelii.
Metrics
References
John MC and Joe G. (2014). Mussaendas for South Florida Landscapes. In: Extension, Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, University of Florida.
Sheat WG and Schofield G. (1995). Complete Gardening in Southern Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town, 76.
Alejandro GD, Razafimandimbison SG and Liede-Schumann S. (2005). Polyphyly of Mussaenda inferred from ITS and trnT-F data and its implication for generic limits in Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 92(3), 544-557.
Rosario TL.(1998). Ornamental Mussaendas of the Philippines. College of Agriculture, University of the Philippines Los Banõs College.
Matthew IP and Karikari SK. (1990). Horticulture: Principles and Practices. Macmillan, Lagos, 184.
Steentoft M. (1988). Flowering plants of West Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 210 – 214.
Chadha KL and Choudhury B. (2007). Ornamental horticulture in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, 172 – 174.
Ogbu J. (2011). Ornamental Mussaenda spp. for Nigeria’s gardens and landscape environment. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria (ASN), 316-319.
Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies Jr FT and Geneve RL. (2007). Plant propagation: principles and practices. Prentice- Hall Inc., New Delhi, 7th ed., 293- 603.
Chadha KL. (2009). Handbook of horticulture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, 76 – 82.
Acquoah G. (2004). Horticulture: principles and practices. Prentice - Hall Press, New Delhi, 2nd ed., 316 - 356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.