Sexual size dimorphism in Ground Beetles and its modeling in latitude gradient

Authors

  • Raisa A. Sukhodolskaya Laboratory of Biomonitoring Institute of Ecology and Mineral Resource Management Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan Republic, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia.
  • Anatoliy A. Saveliev Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan,Tatarstan, Russia.
  • Tatyana A. Gordienko Laboratory of Biomonitoring Institute of Ecology and Mineral Resource Management Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan Republic, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia.
  • Dmitriy N. Vavilov Laboratory of Biomonitoring Institute of Ecology and Mineral Resource Management Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan Republic, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2018.3.1.0009

Keywords:

Carabids, Size variation, Sexual size dimorphism, Latitude gradient, Linear models

Abstract

Large-scale systematic patterns of variation lie in the heart of organismic biology and have interested biologists ever since the beginning. These are most obvious in terms of body size, probably the single most important quantitative trait of an individual. In this relation Ground Beetles are poorly studied, though they are regarded to be sensitive to environmental changes and are accepted bioindicators. Beetles were sampled in 8 provinces of Russia, situated at different latitudes. We measured elytra length in six paleartic eurytopic species of carabids. We used mixed linear models to infer the mean latitude effect on size and sexual dimorphism of females and males. Regression coefficients in both sexes were negative and differed in different species. In C. cancellatus, C.hortensis, P. niger modulus of regression coefficients were larger in females, then, in that species females were more variable than males. In C. granulates and P. melanarius modulus of regression coefficients were larger in males, then, in those species males were more variable in latitude gradient. It is noteworthy that species, sharing the same ecological niches, had different strategies in realizing sex – specific body size variation in latitude gradient. E. g., C. granulatus - C. cancellatus, P. niger - P. melanarius. In general body size decreased in latitude gradient both in females and males. Shifts were steeper in Carabus species, than in Pterostichus.  Despite SSD occurred in some analyzed latitudes and mainly at the margins of area, modeling results did not confirm opinion that SSD systematically changes in latitude gradient.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bergmann C. (1847). Uber die verhaltnisse der warmeokonomie der thierezuihrer grosse. Gottinger Studien Teil, 1, 595-708.

Partridge L and French V. (1996). Thermal evolution of ectotherm body size: why get big in the cold. Animals and temperature: Phenotypic and evolutionary adaptation, 59, 265.

Parsons KE. (1997). Contrasting patterns of heritable geographic variation in shell morphology and growth potential in the marine gastropod Bembicium vittatum: evidence from field experiments. Evolution, 51(3), 784-796.

Terribile LC, Olalla‐Tarraga MA, Diniz‐Filho JAF and Rodríguez MA. (2009). Ecological and evolutionary components of body size: geographic variation of venomous snakes at the global scale. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 98(1), 94-109.

Chauvaud L, Patry Y, Jolivet A, Cam E, Le Goff C, Strand O, Charrier G, Thebault J, Lazure P, Gotthard K and Clavier J. (2012). Variation in size and growth of the great scallop Pecten maximus along a latitudinal gradient. PloS one, 7(5), e37717.

Blanckenhorn WU and Demont M. (2004). Bergmann and converse Bergmann latitudinal clines in arthropods: two ends of a continuum? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 44(6), 413-424.

Bidau C J and Marti DA. (2007). Dichroplus vittatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) follows the converse to Bergmann's rule although male morphological variability increases with latitude. Bulletin of entomological research, 97(1), 69-79.

Whitman DW. (2008). The significance of body size in the Orthoptera: a review. Journal of Orthoptera research, 17(2), 117-134.

Rensch B. (1950). Die Abhängigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 1, 58-69.

Abouheif E and Fairbairn DJ. (1997). A comparative analysis of allometry for sexual size dimorphism: assessing Rensch's rule. The American Naturalist, 149(3), 540-562.

Storz J F, Balasingh J, Bhat HR, Nathan PT, Doss DPS Prakash AA and Fairbairn DJ. (2007). Sexual dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis: a case study of adaptation in response to sexually antagonistic selection. Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 97-105.

Zamudio KR. (1998). The evolution of female‐biased sexual size dimorphism: A population‐level comparative study in horned lizards (Phrynosoma). Evolution, 52(6), 1821-1833.

Kunz TH. (2001). Clinal variation in body size and sexual dimorphism in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72(1), 17-31.

Tamate T and Maekawa K. (2006). Latitudinal variation in sexual size dimorphism of sea-run masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou. Evolution, 60(1), 196-201.

Roitberg BD. (2007). Why pest management needs behavioral ecology and vice versa. Entomological Research, 37(1), 14-18.

Koivula MJ. (2011). Useful model organisms, indicators, or both? Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) reflecting environmental conditions. Zookeys, 100, 287–317.

Sukhodolskaya RA, Saveliev AA and Muhammetnabiev TR. (2016). Sexual Dimorphism of Insects and Conditions of Its Manifestation. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7(2), 1992 – 2001.

Sukhodolskaya R, Saveliev A. (2016). Body size variation in Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Periodicum Biologorum, 118(3), 273 – 278.

Lovich JE and Gibbons JW. (1992). A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Development and Aging, 56, 269 – 281.

Brigadirenko V and Korolev O. (2015) Morphological polymorphism in an urban population of Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger, 1798) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Graellsia 71(1), 025.

Stillwell RC and Fox CW. (2009). Geographic variation of body size, sexual size dimorphism and fitness components of a seed beetle: local adaptation versus phenotypic plasticity. Oikos, 118, 703 – 712.

Romero ML, Rosetti N and Remis MI. (2014). Morphometric variation affecting sexual size dimorphism in Neopedies brunneri (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107(1), 257–263

Sukhodolskaya R. (2014). Variation in Body Size and Body Shape in Ground Beetle Pterostichus melanarius Ill. (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Journal of Agri-Food and Applied Sciences. 2(7), 196-205.

Blanckenhorn WU, Stillwell RC, Young KA, Fox CW and Ashton KG.(2006) When Rensch meets Bergmann: does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude? Evolution, 60, 2004-2011.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Sukhodolskaya, . R. A., Saveliev, A. A., Gordienko, T. A., & Vavilov, D. N. (2018). Sexual size dimorphism in Ground Beetles and its modeling in latitude gradient. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2018.3.1.0009

Issue

Section

Original Article