In vitro propagation of a cut flower variety Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker through direct bulblet proliferation pathways

Authors

  • M. O. Faruq Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.
  • M. Shahinozzaman The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
  • M. A. K. Azad Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.
  • M. N. Amin Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi-6205, Bangladesh.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2018.5.1.0097

Keywords:

Muscari armeniacum, Direct bulblet proliferation, Ornamental plant, Micropropagation

Abstract

Muscari armeniacum is one of the important ornamental cut flowers in floriculture industry, which is native to Southern Europe, North Africa, Western Asia and Asia Minor. In this study, bulb explants (basal plate of bulb having meristems), bulb scales, and leaf segments from in vitro derived bulblets were cultured in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with different plant growth regulator concentrations and combinations to assess their effects on different bulblet organogenesis pathways. The results demonstrated that cytokinin in combination with auxin is required for both axillary and adventitious bulblet regeneration. Benzyladenine (BA) combined with α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) showed significant effects compared to other growth regulator combinations tested. The 4.0 µM BA + 2.0 µM NAA was found to be the best for axillary bulblet formation from bulb explants. Likewise, bulb and leaf segments showed the best response in adventitious bulblet organogenesis when they were cultured in BA-NAA combinations. Out of several concentrations of BA with NAA, 4.0 µM BA + 1.0 µM NAA was optimum for adventitious bulblet regeneration. Bulblets, properly isolated from both axillary and adventitious proliferation systems, showed maximum percentage of rooting on half strength MS medium containing 2.0 µM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). However, all the auxins at more than 2.0 µM concentration showed reduced root formation through either callus formation at the base of shoots or malformation of roots. All the in vitro regenerated plantlets were successfully acclimatized under ex vitro environment with 60% survival rate using garden soil.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wang S, Yang F, Jiu L, Zhang W, Zhang W, Tian Z and Wang F. (2013). Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Muscari armeniacum. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 27, 4243–4247.

Yucesan BB, Feride C and Ekrem G. (2014). Somatic embryogenesis and encapsulation of immature bulblets of an ornamental species, grape hyacinths (Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 38, 716–722.

Uzun S, Parmaksız I, Uranbey S, Mirici S, Sarıhan EU, Ipek A, Kaya MD, Gurbuz B, Arslan N and Sancak C. (2014). In vitro micropropagation from immature embryos of the endemic and endangered Muscari muscarimi Medik. Turkish Journal of Biology, 38, 83–88.

Jevremovic S, Subotic A, Trifunovic M and Nikolic M. (2009). Plant regeneration of Southern Iris adriatic by somatic embryogenesis. Archives of Biological Sciences Belgrade, 61, 413–418.

Ozel CA, Khawar KM and Unal F. (2015). Factors affecting efficient in vitro micropropagation of Muscari muscarimi Medikus using twin bulb scale. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22, 132–138.

Apurva P and Thakur PC. (2009). Somatic embryogenesis and root proliferation from internode of Anthocephalus cadamba in vitro. Asian Journal of Experimental Sciences, 23, 99–102.

Bisswas MK, Dutt M, Roy UK, Islam R and Hossain M. (2009). Development and evaluation of in vitro somaclonal variation in strawberry for improved horticulture traits, Amsterdam. International Society for Horticultural Science, 122, 409–416.

Robinson JP, Britto SJ and Balakrishnan. (2009). Regeneration of plants through somatic embryogenesis in Emilia zeylanica C. B. Clarke - a potential medicinal herb. Botany Research International, 2, 36–41.

Sudersan C and Aboel-Nil. (2002). Somatic embryogenesis of Strut’s pea (Swainsona formosa). Current Science, 83, 9.

Ozel CA, Khawar KM and Unal F. (2007). In vitro axillary bulblet regeneration of Turkish yellow grape hyacinth (Muscari macrocarpum Sweet) from twin scale explants. Research journal of agriculture and biological sciences, 3, 924–929.

Nasircilar A, Mirici S, Karagu ZO, Eren O and Baktir I. (2011). In vitro propagation of endemic and endangered Muscari mirum from different explant types. Turkish Journal of Botany, 35, 37–43.

Koroch A, Juliani HR, Kapteyn J and Simon JE. (2002). In vitro regeneration of Echinacea purpurea from leaf explants. Plant cell, tissue and organ culture, 69, 79–83.

Uranbey S, Cocu S, Sancak C, Parmaksiz I, Khawar KM, Mirici S and Ozcan S. (2003). Efficient adventitious shoot regeneration system in Cicer milkvetch. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 17, 33–37.

Basalma D, Uranbey S, Mirici S and Kolsarici O. (2008). TDZxIBA induced shoot regeneration from cotyledonary leaves and in vitro multiplication in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(8), 960–966.

Uranbey S. (2011). In vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of endangered and endemic Muscari azureum. African Journal of Biotechnology, 63(1), 209–215.

Suzuki S and Nanako M. (2001). Organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from callus cultures in Muscari armeniacum. Leichtl. Ex Bak. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology, 37, 382–387.

Uranbey S. (2010). In vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of Muscari azureum. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 5121–5125.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-30

How to Cite

Faruq, M. O., Shahinozzaman , M., Azad, M. A. K., & Amin, . M. N. (2018). In vitro propagation of a cut flower variety Muscari armeniacum Leichtlin ex Baker through direct bulblet proliferation pathways. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(1), 067–075. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2018.5.1.0097

Issue

Section

Original Article