Assessing Emeria spp and other parasites in the digestive track of guinea fowls (Numida meleagris) farmed in northern Côte d'Ivoire

Authors

  • Ouation Souleymane Soro Training and Research Unit in the Sciences of Nature, Laboratoire Régional de Korhogo LANADA, Laboratory of Biology and Animal Cytology University Nangui Abrogoua, 02 BP 801 Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
  • Yahaya Karamoko Training and Research Unit in the Sciences of Nature, Laboratoire Régional de Korhogo LANADA, Laboratory of Biology and Animal Cytology University Nangui Abrogoua, 02 BP 801 Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
  • Seïdinan Ibrahima Traoré Training and Research Unit in the Sciences of Nature, Laboratoire Régional de Korhogo LANADA, Laboratory of Biology and Animal Cytology University Nangui Abrogoua, 02 BP 801 Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.
  • Jean Noel Yapi Training and Research Unit in the Sciences of Nature, Laboratoire Régional de Korhogo LANADA, Laboratory of Biology and Animal Cytology University Nangui Abrogoua, 02 BP 801 Abidjan 02, Ivory Coast.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2019.6.2.0015

Keywords:

Gastrointestinal, Parasite, Prevalence, Guinea fowl, Numida meleagis, Côte d’Ivoire

Abstract

This study was conducted in four departments of the North of Côte d’Ivoire from November 2016 to October 2017. The aim of the survey was to identify the gastrointestinal parasites responsible for the numerous mortalities and economic losses observed among guinea fowl breeders in the north of Ivory Coast. Thus, a coprological study of 448 feces emitted from animals or taken directly from the small intestine and caeca of dead animals was conducted in (LANADA). The results reveal the presence of five parasites Eimeria spp; Ascaris spp; strongle spp; Trichurus spp and Taenia spp. Coccidia is most represented with an overall prevalence of 42.85%, followed by Ascaris spp (16.07%), strongle spp (14.06%), Trichuris spp (5.35%) and Taenia spp (1.33%). The department of Korhogo has the most rate of coccidia with a prevalence of 77.68%. However, the department of Sinématiali hosts the highest diversity of parasite overall with the presence of the five parasites. Subjects infected are more pronounced during the wet season with the highest prevalence rates in animals over 21 days of age. To increase productivity in Guinea fowl breeding in the north of the country, it would be interesting to offer to breeders, a prophylaxis program adapted to this method of breeding.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ayeni JSO and Ayanda JA. (1982). Studies of the Husbandry and Social Acceptance of Guinea Fowl in Nigeria. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production Africa, 30(2), 139-148.

Nwagu BI and Alawa BI. (1995). Guinea fowl production in Nigeria. Journal of World’s Poultry Research, 51(3), 260-270.

Teye GA and Adam M. (2000). Constraints to guinea fowl production in northern Ghana: A case study of the Damongo area. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 33(2), 153-157.

Boko CK, Kpodekon MT, Farougou S, Dahouda M, Youssao AKI, Aplogan GL, Zanou J and Mainil JG. (2011). Farmer perceptions and pathological constraints in helmeted guinea fowl farming in the Borgou department in North-East Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10), 2348-2357.

Moreki JC and Seabo D. (2012). Guinea Fowl Production in Botswana. Journal of World’s Poultry Research, 2(1) 01-04.

Obike OM, Oke UK and Azu KE. (2011). Comparison of egg production performance and egg quality traits of pearl and black strains of guinea fowl in a humid rain-forest zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10(7), 547-551.

Tye GA and Gyawu P. (2001). The benefits of intensive guinea fowl production in Ghana. World Poultry – Elsevier, 17(9), 53-54.

Boko KC, Kpodekon TM, Dahouda M, Marlier D and Mainil JG. (2012). Technical and health constraints of traditional guinea fowl production in sub-Saharan Africa. Annals of Veterinary Medicine, 156, 25-36.

Dahouda M, Sènou M., Toléba SS, Boko CK, Adandédjan JC and Hornick JL. (2008). Comparison of local Guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) production characteristics in experimental station and rural area in soudano-guinean zone of Bénin. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20(12).

Maho A, Youssouf K, Mbeunodji L, Saboune M and Mopate LY. (1999). Prevalence of digestive parasites of local chickens (Gallus gallus) in North Guera, Chad. Newsletter RIDAF, 9 (1), 5-9.

Hien OC, Nianogo A and Sawadogo L. (2001). Traditional breeding of the local guinea fowl in the west-central zone of Burkina. Science and technology, natural sciences and agronomy, 25 (2), 25-31.

Konlan SP and Avornyo FK. (2013). The effect of wetland on guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) egg productivity and fertility during the dry season in the guinea savannah ecological zone of Ghana. Sky Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(9), 126-131.

Dahouda M, Toleba SS, Youssao AKI, Kogui SB, Aboubakari SY and Hornick JL. (2007). Guinea fowl rearing constraints and flock composition under traditional management in Borgu Department, Benin. Family Poultry, 17(2), 3-14.

Maganga SLS and Haule KS. (1998). Domestication of guinea fowl: A case of Morogoro Municipal, Tanzanie. In: Fao (eds) Wildlife and nature. International Journal Nature Conservation Africa, 14(1), 14-28.

Saina, H, Kusina NT, Kusina JF, Bhebhe E and Lebel S. (2005). Guinea fowl production by indigenous farmers in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17(9).

Kusina NT, Saina H, Kusina JF and Lebel S. (2012). An insight into guinea fowl rearing practices and productivity by guinea fowl keepers in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(25), 3621- 3625.

Issaka BY and Yeboah RN. (2015). Socio-economic attributes of guinea fowl production in two districts in Northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(14), 1209-1217.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-28

How to Cite

Soro, O. S., Karamoko, Y. ., Traoré, S. I., & Yapi, J. N. (2019). Assessing Emeria spp and other parasites in the digestive track of guinea fowls (Numida meleagris) farmed in northern Côte d’Ivoire. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(2), 090–097. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2019.6.2.0015

Issue

Section

Original Article