Comparative assessments of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of repetitive sequence (RLEP) and proline rich antigen (PRA) gene targets for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA from paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) patients in Côte d’Ivoire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.1.0076Keywords:
Leprosy, Mycobacterium leprae, molecular diagnostic, Pra gene, RLEP, Paucibacillary, MultibacillaryAbstract
Several Mycobacterium leprae gene targets could be used for leprosy diagnostic. PCR sensitivity of some gene targets for specific clinical isolates has not yet been established in Côte d'Ivoire. The present study was conducted to compare the sensitivity of the Pra gene and RLEP targets in the detection of M. leprae from nasal mucus and ear dermal pulp fluid samples from paucibacillary and multibacillary patients. Leprosy patients were classified into Paucibacillary and Multibacillary types. DNA extraction from samples was performed by a guanidine thiocyanate method. PCR technique was performed for M. leprae detection from samples. 84.94 % were positive for RLEP target while 69.94 % were positive for the Pra gene target. For paucibacillary cases with bacteriological index negative, 180 one 258 (69.76 %) were positive for the RLEP target and 193 one 258 (74. 80 %) were positive for Pra gene target. Concerning multibacillary cases with bacteriological index positive samples, 100% of the samples were positive for RLEP target and 65.21 % for Pra gene target. The Pra gene target showed a large difference in detection of M. leprae between paucibacillary and multibacillary forms in leprosy patients. In conclusion, PCR-Pra could be a useful tool for diagnosis of leprosy, mainly in cases of Paucibacillary leprosy or when bacilloscopy is negative. The PCR-RLEP appear to be the best target for early diagnosis of leprosy.
Metrics
References
Margarido LC and Rivitti EA. (2005). Hanseníase. In R Focaccia (sci. ed.). Tratado de infectologia, 3rd ed., Atheneu, São Paulo, 939-972.
World Health Organization. (2017). Global leprosy update, 2016: Accelerating reduction of disease burden. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec, (92), 501–520.
Yan W, Xing Y and Yuan LC. (2014). Application of RLEP real-time PCR for detection of M. leprae DNA in paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens for diagnosis of paucibacillary leprosy, Am.J. Trop. Med. Hyg. (90), 524–529.
Martinez AN, Ribeiro-Alves M, Sarno EN and Moraes MO. (2011). Evaluation of qPCR-based assays for leprosy diagnosis directly in clinical specimens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., (5) e1354.
Azevedo MC, Ramuno NM, Fachin LR, Tassa M, Rosa PS, Belone AF, Diorio SM, Soares CT, Garlet GP and Trombone AP. (2017). qPCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae in biopsies and slit skin smear of different leprosy clinical forms. Braz. J. Infect. Dis., (21), 71–78.
Kamalanathan S, Gopalakrishnan SP, Krishnan B, Sekar and Showkath MK. (2017). Nasal PCR assay for the detection of Mycobacterium leprae Pra gene to study subclinical infection in a community. Microbial Pathogenesis.
Koffi OY, Tia YF, Kouamé A, Yoro MB and Koné D. (2018). Factors due to the delay of the diagnosis and the treatment of leprosy in Côte d’Ivoire: case of the patients under treatment at the institute raoul follereau of adzopé. Reviewed Space, Territories, Societies and Health, 1, (1), 108-119.
Chomczynski P and Sacchi N. (1987). Single-Step Method of RNA Isolation by Acid Guanidinium Thiocyanate-Phenol-Chloroform Extraction. Analytical Biochemistry, (162), 156-159.
Banerjee S, Ray D, Bandyopadhyay D, Gupta S, Gupta S and Ghosal C. (2008). Development and application of a new efficient and sensitive multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in diagnosis of leprosy. J Indian Med Assoc, (106), 436-440.
Martinez NA, Britto CF, Nery JA, Sampaio EP, Jardim MR, Sarno EN and Moraes MO. (2006). Evaluation of real-time and conventional PCR targeting complex 85 genes for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in skin biopsy samples from patients diagnosed with leprosy. J. Clin. Microbiol, (9), 3154-3159.
Martinez AN, Talhari C and Moraes MO. (2014). PCR-based techniques for leprosy diagnosis: from the laboratory to the clinic, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., (8), e2655.
Almeida EC, Martinez AN and Maniero VC. (2004). Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the blood and nasal secretion of Brazilian household contacts, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, (99), 509–511.
Phetsuksiri B, Rudeeaneksin J, Supapkul P, Wachapong S, Mahotarn K and Brennan PJ. (2006). A simplified reverse transcriptase PCR for rapid detection of Mycobacterium leprae in skin specimens. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. (3), 319-328.
Turankar RP, Pandey S and Lavania M. (2015). Comparative evaluation of PCR amplification of RLEP, 16S rRNA, rpoT and Sod A gene targets for detection of M. leprae DNA from clinical and environmental samples, Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 454–59.
Patrocínio LG, Goulart IM, Goulart LR, Patrocinio JA, Ferreira FR and Fleury RN. (2005). Detection of Mycobacterium leprae in nasal mucosa biopsies by the polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol, (44), 311–316.
Caleffi KR, Hirata RD, Hirata MH, Caleffi ER, Peixoto PR and Sposito FL. (2010). Evaluation of 85 A-C intergenic region PCR primers for detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in urine samples. Int J Dermatol, (49), 717-718.
Martinez AN, Lahiri R and Pittman TL. (2009). Molecular determination of Mycobacterium leprae viability by use of real time PCR, J. Clin. Microbiol, (47), 2124-2130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.