Weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) using acifluorfen and bentazon herbicides in North-central zone, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.2.0139Keywords:
Phytotoxicity, Herbicide, Soybean, Weed, Acifluorfen, Bentazon, Grain yieldAbstract
The influence of acifluorfen and bentazon in the control of weeds in soybean was studied at the Students’ Research and Demonstration Farm, Kogi State University, Anyigba during the 2016 growing season. A low shattering and early maturity soybean cultivar with high oil content, TGX 1830-20E was used in this trial. The two herbicides were applied post-emergence at two rates each. Acifluorfen (5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl) phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid) was applied at 0.2 and 0.4 kg a.i/ha;bentazon (3-(1-methylethyl(-(1H) -2, 1, 3 –benzothiadazin -4(3H) –one 2,2 – dioxide ) at 0.5 and 1.0 kg a.i/ha, while their mixtures, acifluorfen + asulam applied at 1.3 and 1.6 kg a.i /ha and bentazon + asulam at 1.4 and 1.7 kg a.i/ha. Parameters measured included phytotoxicity of the herbicides to soybean, weed control effectiveness, plant height, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/plant, seed weight /plant and total grain yield (kg/ha). Results showed that weed control effectiveness was higher and the crop performance most especially in terms of total grain yield (Kg/ha) was better in plots that received mixture formulation of acifluorfen + asulam and bentazon + asulam than where acifluorfen or bentazon was applied as single formulation irrespective of rates. The highest grain yield (1066 kg/ha) obtained from plots to which 1.6 kg a.i/ha of acifluorfen + asulam was applied compared favourably with that realized from the hoe weeded plots (1044.5 kg a.i/ha). Abysmally low grain yield was obtained from the weedy check.
Metrics
References
Anon. (1994). Soybean Production and Utilization in Nigeria. Extention Bulletin No 68, NAERLS, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, A.B.U., Zaria.
Jullani AF. (2014). Effects of Plant Population of six soybean varieties grown under Irrigation and Rainfed conditions at Mopa, Nigeria. Research Synopsis, Department of Crop Production, K.S.U., Anyigba.
Franc BS and Martins YS. (2010). Soybean Production in Nigeria: Problems and Prospect. Weed Research, 28, 52.
Olutayo MM. (2016). Response of soybean intercropping with maize (Zeamays ) in a Sub-humid Tropical Environment. Tropical Oil Journal, 11, 18-29.
Owolabi MB Adegoke SW and Ajala F. (2011). A Comparative study of the Nutritional statusof children in villages in southern Nigeria using and not using soybeans. Food andNutrition Bulletin, 16, 48-64.
Pandey BP. (2000). Soybean Response to Rotational Sequence, Row Spacing and Tillage system. Agronomy Journal, 95,81-104.
Mofe ST. (2012). Influence of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Row Spacing on Velvet leaf interference. Weed Science, 32, 112-140.
Madu BS. (2010).Weed Control in soybean (Glycine max (L.). Weed Science, 61, 15-26.
Onyibe JE Kamara AY and Omoigui IO. (2006). Guide to soybean production in BornoState,Nigeria: Promoting sustainable Agriculture in Borno State (PROSAB). Ibadan, Nigeria, 17.
Clay DV and Davison JG. (1978). An evaluation of sand culture technique for studying tolerance of fruit crop to soil- acting herbicides. Weed Research, Oxford, 18, 139-147.
Adesina GO and Akinyemiju OA. (1998). Control of Weeds in Soybean with Imidazolinone herbicides. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 11, 7-15.
Frear DS. (2010). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 23-56.
Moody SKC. (2009). Effects of Weeds on yield and yield parameters of two grain legumes. Tropical Science Journal, 4 (2), 25-30.
Maduka CT.(2001). Weeds and their control measures in Africa. In: Lank MB. International Symposium on weeds. CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya, 130-148.
Oyinloye WS and Omotunde PS. (2008). Weed Control in major leguminous crops in Nigeria-A Review PAN, 20 (2), 50-61.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.