Molecular binding signatures of Trigonella foenum-graecum compounds on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 for possible anti-cancer mechanism in breast cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.3.0160Keywords:
Trigonella foenum-graecum, breast cancer, CDK 4, HER2, palbociclib, in silicoAbstract
Breast cancer (BC) continues to impose high epidemiological and socio-economic burden on female Homo sapiens, even in the face of new therapeutics. Of particular interest here is its neglected rise in low- and middle-income countries, thus necessitating the need for cost effective alternatives. The current understanding of a typical oncogenic BC cell dictates aberrant interplay, downstream the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). CDKs play critical roles in the anomalous multiplicity of cancer cells and thus, represent interesting targets. In this report, structure-based virtual screening was carried out. The binding of compounds from Trigonella foenum-graecum (TF) to cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) compared with that of standard drugs – Abemaciclib, Palbociclib and Ribociclib – was studied. In the light of palbociclib, a heuristic pipeline was designed to ensure specificity and selectivity of new inhibitors capable of antagonizing CDK4-mediated phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (Rb), a crucial step in abrogating neoplastic BC growth. The 2D conformations of phytocompounds were downloaded and optimised before being docked into the active site of CDK4 protein. In silico protocol to predict the drug-likeness of lead compounds, was also carried out. Five (5) phytocompounds emerged with binding energies lower than the standard drugs. Upon screening of lead compounds for their drug-likeness, four emerged as drug candidates: Irilone, Calycosin, Daidzein and Formononetin, which complied with Lipinski’s “Rule of Five” (RO5). Compounds from TF were found to exhibit lower binding energies, compared to standard drugs and could be potent in cancer treatment, especially human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) BC.
Metrics
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A. (2017). Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 67(1), 7–30.
Mitri Z, Constantine T and O'Regan R. (2012). The HER2 receptor in breast cancer: pathophysiology, clinical use, and new advances in therapy. Chemotherapy research and practice.
Sotiriou C and Pusztai L. (2009). Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(8), 790 – 800.
English DP, Roque DM and Santin AD. (2013). HER2 expression beyond breast cancer: therapeutic implications for gynecologic malignancies. Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 17(2), 85 – 99.
Yan M, Parker BA, Schwab R and Kurzrock R. (2014). HER2 aberrations in cancer: implications for therapy. Cancer treatment reviews, 40(6), 770 – 80.
Burstein HJ. (2005). The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(16), 1652.
Altenburg JD and Farag SS. (2015). The potential role of PD0332991 (Palbociclib) in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 24(2), 261 – 71.
Peurala E, Koivunen P, Haapasaari KM, Bloigu R and Jukkola-Vuorinen A. (2013). The prognostic significance and value of cyclin D1, CDK4 and p16 in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research, 15(1), R5.
Choi YJ, Li X, Hydbring P, Sanda T, Stefano J, Christie AL, Signoretti S, Look AT, Kung AL, von Boehmer H and Sicinski P. (2012). The requirement for cyclin D function in tumor maintenance. Cancer cell, 22(4), 438 – 51.
Baker SJ and Reddy EP. (2012). CDK4: a key player in the cell cycle, development, and cancer. Genes & cancer, 3(11-12), 658 – 69.
Shapiro GI. (2006). Cyclin-dependent kinase pathways as targets for cancer treatment. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(11), 1770 – 1783.
Hamilton E and Infante JR. (2016). Targeting CDK4/6 in patients with cancer. Cancer treatment reviews, 45, 129 – 38.
Xu H, Yu S, Liu Q, Yuan X, Mani S, Pestell RG and Wu K. (2017). Recent advances of highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer. Journal of hematology and oncology, 10(1), 97.
Finn RS, Aleshin A and Slamon DJ. (2016). Targeting the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Research, 18(1), 17.
Sherr CJ, Beach D and Shapiro GI. Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: from discovery to therapy. Cancer Discovery, 6 (4), 353 –367.
Vidula N and Rugo HS. (2016). Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer: a review of preclinical and clinical data. Clinical breast cancer, 16(1), 8 – 17.
Harvey AL. (2008). Natural products in drug discovery. Drug discovery today, 13(19-20), 894 – 901.
Shabbeer S, Sobolewski M, Anchoori RK, Kachhap S, Hidalgo M, Jimeno A, Davidson NE, Carducci M and Khan SR. (2009). Fenugreek: a naturally occurring edible spice as an anticancer agent. Cancer biology and therapy, 8(3), 272 – 278.
Uemura T, Hirai S, Mizoguchi N, Goto T, Lee JY, Taketani K, Nakano Y, Shono J, Hoshino S, Tsuge N and Narukami T. (2010). Diosgenin present in fenugreek improves glucose metabolism by promoting adipocyte differentiation and inhibiting inflammation in adipose tissues. Molecular nutrition and food research, 54(11), 1596 – 608.
Lipinski CA. (2004). Lead-and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 1(4), 337 – 41.
Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW and Feeney PJ. (1997). Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 23(1-3), 3 – 25.
Chen P, Lee NV, Hu W, Xu M, Ferre RA, Lam H, Bergqvist S, Solowiej J, Diehl W, He YA and Yu X. (2016). Spectrum and Degree of CDK drug interactions predicts clinical performance. Molecular cancer therapeutics, 15(10), 2273 – 2281.
Lu J. (2015). Palbociclib: a first-in-class CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor for the treatment of hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer. Journal of hematology and oncology, 8(1), 98.
Rondla R, PadmaRao LS, Ramatenki V, Haredi-Abdel-Monsef A, Potlapally SR and Vuruputuri U. (2017). Selective ATP competitive leads of CDK4: Discovery by 3D-QSAR pharmacophore mapping and molecular docking approach. Computational biology and chemistry, 71, 224 – 229.
Pace CN, Fu H, Fryar KL, Landua J, Trevino SR, Shirley BA, Hendricks MM, Iimura S, Gajiwala K, Scholtz JM and Grimsley GR. (2011). Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. Journal of molecular biology, 408(3), 514 – 528.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.