Assessment of variation in the agronomic traits of wild cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) subspecies under a rainforest agro-ecology in Nigeria

Abiodun Olayinka; Adesike Kolawole; Christopher Ilori

doi:10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.3.0188

Authors

Abiodun Olayinka Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Adesike Kolawole Department of Crop Production and Soil science, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Christopher Ilori Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.3.0188

Keywords:

Accession, Cowpea improvement, Subsp. dekindtiana, Subsp. stenophylla, Subsp. tenuis, Variability

Abstract

Wild relatives of crop species are often sources of genes for diseases and insect pest resistance, increased yield, improved quality, earliness and wide adaptation. Wild subspecies of cowpea that are cross-compatible with cultivated varieties have great potential as an additional source of useful germplasm for cowpea improvement. In this study, the variations in the growth and agronomic traits of 20 cowpea accessions from the subspecies: stenophylla, dekindtiana and tenuis were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Highly significant variations were observed among accessions for all traits measured. There were variations for same traits among the accessions from the subsp. dekindtiana whereas, the accessions from the subspecies stenophylla and tenuis showed similar performance. Accession TVNu1839 from the subsp. dekindtiana showed an outstanding performance in number of days to flowering and pod ripening, number of main branches at flowering, number of seeds per pod, 100 - seed weight and total seed weight which implies that the accession has a high yield potential. Therefore, the subsp. dekindtiana may be a useful source of genetic variation needed for the development of improved cowpea varieties for resource poor farmers at a relatively low expense, since it has been established that they are cross-compatible with the cultivated varieties. Highly significant (P < 0.001) and very strong correlation coefficient among traits, may be useful as selection index and can be exploited in cowpea improvement programmes. These results confirm that wild cowpea subspecies have the potential to enhance cowpea gene pool.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Singh BB, Chambliss OL and Sharma B. (1997). Recent advances in cowpea breeding. Advances in Cowpea Research, 30-49.

IITA (International Institute of Tropical Agriculture). (2015). Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata.URL.

Langyintuo AS, Ntoukam G, Murdock L, Lowenberg-DeBoer J and Millera DJ. (2004). Consumer preferences for cowpea in Cameroon and Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 203-213.

Langyintuo AS, Lowenberg-DeBoer J, Faye M, Lambert D, Ibro G, Moussa B, Kergna A, Kushwaha S, Musa S and Ntoukam G. (2003). Cowpea supply and demand in West Africa. Field Crops Research, 82(2-3), 215-231.

Singh BB, Ajeigbe HA, Tarawali SA, Fernandez-Rivera S and Abubakar M. (2003). Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops Research, 84(1-2), 169-177.

Xiong H, Shi A, Mou B, Qin J, Motes D, Lu W, Ma J, Weng Y and Wu D. (2016). Genetic diversity and population structure of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). PLoS One 11(8), e0160941.

Davis DW, Oelke EA, Oplinger ES, Doll JD, Hanson CV and Putnam DH. (1991). Alternative plant and animal products: Programs in information exchange and research. In: Janick J and Simon JE. (Eds), Alternative field crops manual new crops NY: John Wiley and Sons New York, 133-143.

Ortiz R. (1998). Cowpea from Nigeria: a silent food revolution. Outlook on Agriculture, 27, 125-128.

Verdcourt B. (1970). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoïdeae for the 'Flora of Tropical East Africa': V. Kew Bulletin, 25(1), 65-169.

Marechal R, Mascherpa JM and Stainier F. (1978). Taxonomic study of a group of species of the genera Phaseolus and Vigna (Papilionaceae) on the basis of morphological and pollen data, processed for computer analysis. Boissiera, 28, 1-273.

Ng NQ. (1995). Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (Leguminosae - Papilionoideae). In: Smartt J and Simmonds NW. (Eds.), Evolution of crop plants. Longmans, New York, 326 - 332.

Pasquet RS. (1999). Genetic relationships among subspecies of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp based on allozyme variation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 98 (6-7), 1104-1119.

Boudoin JP and Mareehal R. (1985). Genetic diversity in Vigna. In: Singh SR and Rachie KO (Eds), Cowpea research, production and utilization. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 3-9.

Padulosi S and Ng NQ. (1997). Origin, taxonomy, and morphology of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In: Singh BB, Mohan Raj DR, Dashiell KE and. Jackai LEN (Eds), Advances in cowpea research. Copublication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 1-12.

Pasquet RS. (1997). A new subspecies of Vigna unguiculata (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Kew bulletin, 52(4).

Boukar O, Bhattacharjee R, Fatokun C, Kumar PL and Gueye B. (2013). Cowpea. In: Singh M, Upadhyaya HD and Bisht IS. (Eds), Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement. Elsevier, London UK, 137-155.

Doebley JF, Gaut BS and Smith BD. (2006). The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell, 127(7), 1309-1321.

Harlan JR. (1976) Genetic resources in wild relatives of crops 1. Crop Science, 16(3), 329-333.

McCouch S, Baute GJ, Bradeen J, Bramel P, Bretting PK, Buckler E, Burke JM, Charest D, Cloutier S, Cole G and Dempewolf H. (2013). Agriculture: Feeding the future. Nature, 499(7456), 23-24.

Cooper HD, Spillane C and Hodgkin T. (2001). Broadening the genetic base of crops: an overview. In: Cooper HD, Spillan C and Hodgkin T (Eds), Broadening the genetic base of crop production. Wallingford: CABI publishing in cooperation with FAO and IPGRI, CAB International, 1-23.

Dwivedi SL, Upadhyaya HD, Stalker HT, Blair MW, Bertioli DJ, Nielen S and Ortiz R. (2008). Enhancing crop gene pools with beneficial traits using wild relatives. Plant Breeding Review, 30, 180-230.

Oyatomi O, Fatokun C, Boukar O, Abberton M and Ilori C. (2016). Screening Wild Vigna Species and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Landraces for Sources of Resistance to Striga gesnerioides. In: Enhancing crop genepool use: capturing wild relatives and landrace diversity for crop improvement; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 27-31.

Popoola JO, Adebambo A, Ejoh S., Agre P, Adegbite A and Omonhinmin C. (2017). Morphological diversity and cytological studies in some accessions of Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Richard. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 19(5), 1-12.

Padulosi S and Ng NQ. (1990). Wild Vigna species in Africa. Their collection and potential utilization, Cowpea Genetic Resources. Ng NQ and Monti LM. (Eds), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, 58-77.

Kouadio D, Echikh N, Toussaint A, Pasquet RS and Baudoin JP. (2007). Organisation du pool génique de Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.: croisements entre les formes sauvages et cultivées du niébé. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment, 11(1), 47-57.

Mohammed MS, Russom Z and Abdul SD. (2010). Studies on crossability between cultivated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) varieties and their wild relative (var. pubescens TVNu110-3A). International Research Journal of Plant Science, 15, 133 - 135.

Gur A and Zamir D. (2004). Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS biology, 2(10), e245.

Acosta-Gallegos J, Kelly JD and Gepts P. (2007). Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Science, 47, 44-59.

Mahalakshmi V, Ng Q, Lawson M and Ortiz R. (2007). Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] core collection defined by geographical, agronomical and botanical descriptors. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization, 5(3), 113 - 119.

Nass LL and Paterniani E. (2000). Pre-breeding: a link between genetic resources and maize breeding. Scientia Agricola, 57(3), 581-587.

Fatokun CA, Perrino P and Ng NQ. (1997). Wide crossing in African Vigna species. In : Singh BB, Mohan Raj DR, Dashiell KE and Jackai LEN. (Eds), Advances in cowpea research. copublication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 50-57.

IBPGR. (International Biodiversity for Plant Genetic Resources). (1983). International board for plant genetic resources. Cowpea descriptors. IBPGR, Rome, Italy, 1-30.

Duncan DB. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics, 11(1), 1 - 42.

SAS Institute. (2010). Statistical analysis software (SAS). Release 9.3. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

Bozokalfa MK, Eşiyok D and Turhan K. (2009). Patterns of phenotypic variation in germplasm collection of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) from Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1), 83-95.

Mafakheri K, Bihamta MR and Abbasi AR. (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) germplasm using morphological and molecular characterization. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3(1).

Kandel P, Sharma P, Subedi S, Gupta S, Bhattarai S and Basent M. (2019). Germplasm evaluation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Dang District. JOJ Wildlife and Biodiversity, 1(5), 555572.

Ajayi AT and Adesoye AI. (2013). Cluster analysis technique for assessing variability in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) accessions from Nigeria. Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, 50(2), 1-7.

Singh BB and Ajeigbe H. (2007). Improved cowpea-cereals-based cropping systems for household food security and poverty reduction in West Africa. Journal of Crop Improvement, 19(1-2), 157-172.

Dugje IY, Omogui LO, Ekeleme F. Kamara AY and Ajeigbe H. (2009). Farmers, guide to cowpea production in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 1- 20.

Molosiwa OO, Gwafila C, Makore J and Chite SM. (2016). Phenotypic variation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) germplasm collection from Botswana. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 8(7), 153-163.

Popoola JO, Aremu BR, Daramola FY, Ejoh AS and Adegbite AE. (2015). Morphometric analysis of some species in the genus Vigna (L.) Walp: Implication for utilization for genetic improvement. Journal of Biological Sciences, 15(4), 156-166.

Govindaraj M, Vetriventhan M and Srinivasan M. (2015). Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genetics research international, 1-14.

Rawal KM. (1975). Cowpea breeding at IITA, An overview In: Luse RA and Racchie KO. (Eds), Proceedings of IITA collaborators’ meeting on grain legume improvement, Ibadan, 9-13.

Lush WM. (1979). Floral morphology of wild and cultivated cowpea. Economic Botany, 33(4), 442-447.

Steele WM and Mehra KL. (1980). Structure, evolution and adaptation to farming system and environment in Vigna. In: Summerfield RJ and Bunting AH. (Eds), Advances in legume science. HMSO, London, 393-404.

Ng NQ and Marechal R. (1985). Cowpea taxonomy, origin and germplasm. In: Singh SR and Rachie KO. (Eds), Cowpea research, production and utilization. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 11-21.

Singh M. (1992). Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in plant traits. International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, 1-33.

Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL and Ort DR. (2006), Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant, Cell & Environment, 29(3), 315-330.

Gutam AS, Mittal RK and Bhandari JC. (1999). Correlations and path analysis in maize (Zea mays L.) Annals of Agri Bio Research, 4, 69-71.

Hanchinal RR, Habib AF and Goud JV. (1979). Correlation and path analysis in Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp. Mysore journal of agricultural sciences, 13(3), 253-257.

Aliyu OM and Makinde BO. (2016). Phenotypic analysis of seed yield and yield components in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, 4(2), 252-261.