Study in vitro and in vivo on the synergy between iodophor-impregnated incision drapes and antisepsis with 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropanol or 10% iodine povidone

Authors

  • Rafael Herruzo Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Salud Publica y Microbiología. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
  • Irene Herruzo Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.1.0372

Keywords:

Synergy, Ioban2, Chlorhexidine-Isopropanol, Iodine-Povidone

Abstract

Background: If the previous antisepsis is done with povidone iodine (PVP-I), iodophore-impregnated incision drapes (Ioban2) will not diminish surgical site infection (SSI).  Could they do so if antisepsis were done with chlorhexidine 2% in isopropanol 70% (ClxIPA) instead?

Methods:  1) In vitro: Assessment of the synergistic effect of ClxIPA-Ioban2 by antiseptogram of eich microorganisms. On other dishes, PVP-I (or sterile distilled water as a control) were used, instead of ClxIPA. 2) In vivo: The cutaneous microbiota from the back of the second phalange of the 2nd -5th fingers of both hands of volunteers were studied. Then antisepsis was carried out on both hands with ClxIPA and, on the non-dominant hand, a band of Ioban2 was wrapped around the sampling surface. Two hours later, the microbiota was collected from both hands into a solution with culture medium and an antiseptic inhibitor. The log10-reduction of the before-after microbiota for each volunteer, was compared with him/herself. A similar process was done with PVP-I or distilled water (control).

Results In vitro, a significant increase in inhibition halos were obtained when using Ioban2 together these two antiseptics. In vivo, Ioban2 helped both antiseptics to reduce microbial colonization 2 hours after antisepsis. Moreover, the antimicrobial efficacy, in both experiments, was significantly higher with ClxIPA than with PVP-I (with or without Ioban2).

Conclusion:-Ioban2 increases significantly the antimicrobial efficacy of ClxIPA, in vitro and in vivo. Presurgical antisepsis with ClxIPA + Ioban2 could decrease the SSI, but it must be verified by controlled studies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

C.D.C. National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. 2017

Bennet JV, Brachman PS. Hospital Infections. Fourth Ed. Lippincot-Raven. Philadelphia.1998

Proyecto Infección Quirúrgica Zero del Sistema Nacional de Salud de España (proyecto IQZ, coordinado por la S.E.M.P.S.P.H.). S.N.S. 2017

W.H.O. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections.2016

Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM et al. Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:18-26

Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ, Martin S, Cahill AG, Odibo AO et al. A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:647-55.

Dan Zhang MM , Xi-Chen Wang MM, Zeng-Xi Yang MM, Jian-Xin Gan MM, Jie-Bin Pan MM, Lan-Ning Y. Preoperative chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine antisepsis for preventing surgical site infection: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Intern J Surg 2017; 44:176-84

Webster J, Alghamdi A.Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infections (review). Cochrane. J Wiley & Sons. 2015.

Anderson MJ, Horn ME, Lin YC, Parks PJ, Peterson ML. Efficacy of concurrent application of chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine against six nosocomial pathogens. Am J Infect Control 2010; 38:826-31

Ngai M, Van Arsdale A, Govindappagari S, Judge NE, Neto NK, Bernstein J et al. Skin Preparation for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Cesarean Delivery. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:1251–7

Davies BM, Patel HC. Does chlorhexidine and povidone-iodine preoperative antisepsis reduce surgical site infection in cranial neurosurgery? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98:405–8.

Rezapoor M, Tan TL, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Incise draping reduces the rate of contamination of the surgical site during hip surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthropl 2018; 33:1891-5.

Herruzo R, Vizcaino MJ, Herruzo I, Sanchez M. Surface disinfectants for Burn Units evaluated by a new double method, using microorganisms recently isolated from patients, on a surface germ-carrier model. J Burn Care Res 2017; 38:663-9.

Herruzo R, Vizcaino MJ, Fernandez MJ. Usefulness of an alcohol solution of N-duopropenide for the surgical antisepsis of the hands compared with handwashing with iodine-povidone and chlorhexidine: clinical essay. J Surg Res 2000; 94:6-12

Herruzo R, Vizcaino MJ, Yela R. Surgical hand preparation with chlorhexidine soap or povidone iodine: new methods to increase immediate and residual effectiveness, and provide a safe alternative to alcohol solutions. J Hosp Infect 2018; 98:365-8.

Yoshimura Y, Kubo S, Hirohashi K , Ogawa M, Morimoto K, Shirat K, et al. Plastic iodophor drape during liver surgery operative use of the iodophor-impregnated adhesive drape to prevent wound infection during high risk surgery. World J Surg 2003; 27:685–8

Bejko J, Tarzia V, Carrozzini M, Gallo M,Bortolussi G, Comisso M et al.Comparison of Efficacy and Cost of Iodine Impregnated Drape vs. Standard Drape in Cardiac Surgery: Study in 5100 Patients. J Cardiovasc Trans Res 2015; 8:431–7

NICE Guideline. Surgical site infection: prevention and treatment. 2008. Nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-30

How to Cite

Rafael Herruzo, & Irene Herruzo. (2021). Study in vitro and in vivo on the synergy between iodophor-impregnated incision drapes and antisepsis with 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropanol or 10% iodine povidone. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 14(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.1.0372

Issue

Section

Original Article