Risk management of infectious disease using multidimensional Omics: Molecular diagnostic and personal care of tuberculosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.15.1.0071Keywords:
Multidimensional Omics, Infectious disease, Whole genome sequencing, Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), Mycobacterium tuberculosisAbstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the top 10 leading causes of death worldwide responsible for over 1.5 million deaths annually. It is caused by hazardous biological pathogen (i.e., Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)) with single infectious agent, surpassing even HIV/AIDS. Roughly one-quarter of the world's population has latent TB, meaning that people have been infected by tuberculosis bacteria but have not yet developed the disease. Patients with active tuberculosis on average infect five to fifteen other people via airborne droplets. Once infected, people with HIV are 19 times more likely to develop active tuberculosis which has almost 100% mortality for this group, if not treated properly. Comparatively, 45% of HIV negative people will die if they develop active tuberculosis and are not adequately medicated. This is concerning since 95% of cases and deaths are in developing countries, where treatments and diagnosis may not be timely. Additionally, current detection methods do not distinguish active tuberculosis from a cleared or latent infection while microbiological culture of mycobacteria is slow. However, medical discoveries and newly developed technologies allowed for unification of disciplines incorporating omics into everyday biological research. The goal of this short review is to demonstrate ways in which field of multidimensional Omics could contributed to the advanced detection of infectious disease by improving accuracy and quality of patient care by implementing molecular based detection of pathogen (i.e., antigenicity and metabolomics tools) as well as personal care with follow-up monitoring care (i.e., immunogenicity and vaccinomics tools) in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of tuberculosis.
Metrics
References
Boehme CC, Saacks S, O'Brien RJ. The Changing Landscape of Diagnostic Services for Tuberculosis. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2013; 34(01): 17.
Cai Y, Yang Q, Tang Y, Zhang M, Liu H, Zhang G, Deng Q, Huang J, Gao Z, Zhou B, Feng CG, Chen X. Increased Complement C1q Level Marks Active Disease in Human Tuberculosis. PloS One. 2014; 9(3): e92340.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. History of the World TB Day. 2019.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Treatment for TB Disease. 2019.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Testing for Tuberculosis. 2020.
Chang KC, Leung CC. Systematic review of interferon-gamma release assays in tuberculosis: focus on likelihood ratios. Thorax. 2010; 65(3): 271-276.
Goff A, Cantillon D, Muraro Wildner L, Waddell SJ. Multi-Omics Technologies Applied to Tuberculosis Drug Discovery. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(13): 4629.
Haas CT, Roe JK, Pollara G, Mehta M, Noursadeghi M. Diagnostic ‘omics’ for active tuberculosis. BMC Medicine. 2016; 14(1): 37.
He Y. Omics‐Based Systems Vaccinology for Vaccine Target Identification. Drug Development Research. 2012; 73(8): 559-568.
Meissner HC. Options for diagnosing asymptomatic (latent) tuberculosis infection. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2018.
Molicotti P, Bua A, Zanetti S. Cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: choices in developing countries. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2014; 8(01): 24.
National Health Institute. BCG tuberculosis (TB) vaccine overview. nhs.uk. 2019.
Nazir Z, Afridi SG, Shah M, Shams S, Khan A. Reverse vaccinology and subtractive genomics-based putative vaccine targets identification for Burkholderia pseudomallei Bp1651. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018; 125: 219-229.
Sharma S, Hameed S, Fatima Z. Lipidomic insights to understand membrane dynamics in response to vanillin in Mycobacterium smegmatis. International Microbiology: The Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology. 2020; 23(2): 263-276.
Walker TM, Lalor MK, Broda A, Ortega LS, Morgan M, Parker L, Churchill S, Bennett K, Golubchik T, Giess AP, Elias C, Jeffery KJ, Bowler I, Laurenson IF, Barrett A, Drobniewski F, McCarthy ND, Anderson LF, Abubakar I, and Conlon CP. Assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission in Oxfordshire, UK, 2007-12, with whole pathogen genome sequences: an observational study. 2014; 2(4): 285-292.
Walter ND, Miller MA, Vasquez J, Weiner M, Chapman A, Engle M, Higgins M, Quinones AM, Rosselli V, Canono E, Yoon C, Cattamanchi A, Davis JL, Phang T, Stearman RS, Datta G, Garcia BJ, Daley CL, Strong M, Geraci MW. Blood Transcriptional Biomarkers for Active Tuberculosis among Patients in the United States: a Case-Control Study with Systematic Cross-Classifier Evaluation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2016; 54(2): 274-282.
Wilson M, DeRisi J, Kristensen HH, Imboden P, Rane S, Brown PO, Schoolnik GK. Exploring drug-induced alterations in gene expression in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by microarray hybridization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999; 96(22): 12833-12838.
World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. 2018.
World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. WHO. 2019.
Vijayaraj M, Abhinand PA, Ragunath PK. Virtual screening of a MDR-TB WhiB6 target identified by gene expression profiling Bioinformation. 2019; 15(8): 557–567.
World Health Organization. Tuberculosis (TB). 2020.
Yang H, Kruh-Garcia NA, Dobos KM. Purified Protein Derivatives of Tuberculin - Past, Present, and Future. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2012; 66(3): 273-280.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.