Correlation between phenotypes of restriction / modification systems and efficiency of transformation in Campylobacter jejuni

Authors

  • Masaaki Minami Department of Bacteriology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Takafumi Ando Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Michio Ohta Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Hidemi Goto Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya University, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.17.1.0315

Keywords:

Campylobacter jejuni, Transformation efficacy, Restriction modification, Horizontal gene transfer, Natural competent

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of restriction and modification genes expressed in Campylobacter jejuni, a naturally competent organism, on transformation efficiency. Fourteen strains of C. jejuni were tested for sensitivity to 29 restriction enzymes. Strains that showed the same susceptibility pattern by either agarose gel electrophoresis or PFGE were grouped together. Natural transformation between strains within and between groups was assessed using two chromosomal markers, one an artificially introduced gene and the other a selected point mutation. However, no correlation was found between transformation efficiency and sensitivity to the restriction enzymes tested. The activity of the restriction and modification system alone could not explain the failure of transformation to occur or the generation of stable clones in a population of C. jejuni with other abilities. It is likely that other factors influence horizontal gene flow in this organism. We suggested that the rule that the restriction and modification system affect horizontal gene flow, based on studies of transfection with E. coli, may not apply to the exchange of chromosomal DNA in C. jejuni.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tauxe RE. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations. In: Campylobacter jejuni. Current Status and Future Trends. Washington DC. ASM press. 1992; 9-19.

Wassenaar TM, Blaser MJ. Pathophysiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections of humans. Microbes and Infection. 1999; 1: 1023-1033.

Dingle KE, Colles FM, Wareing DR, Ure R, Fox AJ, Bolton FE, Bootsma HJ, Willems RJ, Urwin R, Maiden MC. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2001; 39: 14-23.

Meinersmann RJ, Patton CM, Evins GM, Wachsmuth IK, Fields PI. Genetic diversity and relationships of Campylobacter species and subspecies. International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002; 5: 1789-1797.

Dubnau D. DNA uptake in bacteria. Annual Reviews of Microbiology. 1999; 53: 217-244.

Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment. Microbiological Reviews. 1994; 58: 563-602.

Wang Y, Taylor DE. Natural transformation in Campylobacter species. Journal of Bacteriology. 1990; 172: 949-955.

Wiesner RS, Hendrixson DR, DiRita VJ. Natural transformation of Campylobacter jejuni requires components of a type II secretion system. Journal of Bacteriology. 2003; 185: 5408-5418.

Ahmed IH, Manning G, Wassenaar TM, Cawthraw S, Newell DG. Identification of genetic differences between two Campylobacter jejuni strains with different colonization potentials. Microbiology. 2002; 148: 1203-1212.

Michaud S, Menard S, Gaudreau C, Arbeit RD. Comparison of smaI-defined genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni examined by kpnI: a population-based study. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2001; 50: 1075-1081.

Wassenaar TM, Fry BN, van der Zeijst BAM. Genetic manipulation of Campylobacter evaluation of natural transformation and electro-transformation. Gene. 1993; 132: 131-135.

Wassenaar TM, Newell DG. Genotyping methods of Campylobacter: a review. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000; 66: 1-9.

Manning G, Duim B, Wassenaar TM, Wagenaar JA, Ridley A, Newell DG. Evidence for a genetically stable clone of Campylobacter jejuni. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001; 67: 1185-1189.

Wassenaar TM, Lastovica AJ, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, Fry BN. Genetic characterization of Campylobacter jejuni O:41 in relation to Guillain Barre Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000; 38: 874-876.

Duim B, Godschalk PC, van den Braak N, Dingle KE, Dijkstra JR, Leyde E, van der Plas J, Colles FM, Endtz HP, Wagenaar JA, Maiden MC, van Belkum A. Moleclar evidence for dissemination of unique Campylobacter jejuni clones in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003; 41: 5593-5597.

De Boer P, Wagenaar JA, Achterberg RP, van Putten JPM, Schouls LM, Duim B. Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo. Molecular Microbiology. 2002; 44: 351-359.

Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, Basham D, Chillingworth T, Davies RM, Feltwell T, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Karlyshev AV, Moule S, Pallen MJ, Penn CW, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rutherford KM, van Vliet AH, Whitehead S, Barrell BG. The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000; 403: 665-668.

Wassenaar TM, Wagenaar JA, Rigter A, Fearnley C, Newell DG, Duim B. Homonucleotide stretches in chromosomal DNA of Campylobacter jejuni display high frequency polymorphism as detected by direct PCR analysis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2002; 212: 77-85.

Price C, Bickle TA. A possible role for DNA restriction in bacterial evolution. Microbiological Sciences. 1986; 3: 296-299.

Wassenaar TM, Fry BN, Van der Zeijst BAM. Variation of the flagellin gene locus of Campylobacter jejuni by recombination and horizontal gene transfer. Microbiology. 1995; 141: 95-1.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-26

How to Cite

Minami, M. ., Ando, T. ., Ohta, M. ., & Goto, H. . (2021). Correlation between phenotypes of restriction / modification systems and efficiency of transformation in Campylobacter jejuni. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 17(1), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2021.17.1.0315

Issue

Section

Original Article